JUDGEMENT
MOHAMMAD RAFIQ -
(1.) This writ petition has been filed by the
petitioners against the order dated 13.03.2014 passed by Additional
District and Sessions Judge No.1, Behror, Alwar by which appeal of the
petitioners against the order dated 24.07.2013 passed by Civil Judge (JD)
Behror, District Alwar has been dismissed. The Civil Judge by the
aforesaid order dated 24.07.2013 allowed the application under Order 39,
Rule 1 & 2 CPC for temporary injunction filed by the
plaintiff-respondents nos.1 to 4 in the civil suit filed by them.
(2.) Grievance of the petitioners is that a suit for permanent injunction along with an application for temporary injunction was preferred by the
respondent nos.1 to 4 to the effect that the petitioners and other
workers have allegedly in forged manner formed a trade union and intended
to get it registered before the Registrar. The learned trial court
without going into the question of maintainability of the suit by virtue
of bar contained in Section 18 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 allowed the
application for temporary injunction of the respondent nos.1 to 4 and
restrained them to persuade the trade union activities in flagrant
violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and also
restrained the Registrar, Trade Unions to register the trade union of the
petitioners and other workers. Petitioners aggrieved by the aforesaid
order dated 24.07.2013 preferred an appeal before the appellate court.
The appellate court by impugned order dated 13.03.2014 dismissed the
appeal without going into the factual aspects, preliminary objections and
the statutory provisions enshrined in Constitution of India and Trade
Unions Act, 1926.
(3.) Shri Yogesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926
provides that 10% of the members/workmen of any factory can form the
trade union and the Trade Unions Act, 1926 does not provide for any
remedy to the plaintiffs to object for registration of fresh trade union.
It is contended that 131 members of the petitioners' trade union attended
the meeting and passed the resolution for formation of trade union and
this strength is more than 20% of the total workmen presently working in
the factory of respondent no.6. Thus petitioners cannot be retrained to
form the trade union as per Rules.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.