JUDGEMENT
PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL,J. -
(1.) With the consent of learned counsel for
the parties the revision petition itself is finally heard.
(2.) The petitioner, who is father of the respondent, has filed this Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with Section 401
Cr.P.C. against the order dated 11.5.2015 passed by the Judge, Family
Court, Sikar in Criminal Misc.Case No.798/2013 whereby the learned Court
below allowed the application filed by the respondent under Section 127
Cr.P.C. and by modifying the order dated 20.3.2004 passed by the
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sikar in Criminal Case No.25/2003
granted Rs. 5,000/- per month as maintenance till the marriage of the
respondent or she becomes capable to earn her own independent income. It
was further directed that any amount of maintenance already paid by the
petitioner to the respondent shall be set-off.
(3.) Brief relevant facts for the disposal of this revision petition are that respondent, who is daughter of the petitioner, filed an application
under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Sikar and claimed an amount of Rs. 6200/- per month as maintenance from
the petitioner. The application filed by the respondent was allowed by
the aforesaid Court vide order dated 20.3.2004 and it was ordered that
the petitioner shall pay Rs. 2,000/- per month as maintenance to
respondent from 22.2.2003 i.e. the date on which application under
Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed and this amount shall be paid till the date
on which the respondent attains majority. Thereafter, an application
under Section 127 Cr.P.C. was filed by the respondent on 22.12.2012
before the same Court with a prayer to modify the order dated 22.3.2004
in the manner that the amount of maintenance may be ordered to be paid to
her till her marriage. Reply to the application was filed by the
petitioner with a prayer to dismiss the application by the reason that
the Court is not empowered to modify the aforesaid order. It is to be
noted that application filed by the respondent was transferred from the
Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate to Family Court, Sikar and
learned Family Court allowed the application filed by the respondent vide
impugned order dated 11.5.2015.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.