SUJAN SINGH MEENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
LAWS(RAJ)-2016-4-166
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (AT: JAIPUR)
Decided on April 28,2016

Sujan Singh Meena Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA,J. - (1.) This bail cancellation application has been filed under Sec. 439 (2) Cr.P.C.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No. 295/2015 was lodged at RS. Suraouth, Karauli for the offences mentioned therein, whereupon the investigation was commenced. During the course of investigation, the accused Ratan Singh @ Sher Singh and Mohammad Anwar were arrested. Thereafter, they jointly moved bail application before the learned court below, which was dismissed on 11.2.2016. Against the aforesaid order one of the accused namely; Mohammad Anwar filed bail application before this Court bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail duplication No. 2360/2016, which was granted by this Court on 18.2.2016. Thereafter, against the same order dated 11.2.2016, accused Ratan Singh @ Sher Singh filed a bail application bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2742/2016 before this Court which was allowed by this Court on 4.3.2016 on terrain conditions, the relevant portion of which is reproduced as under:
(3.) "Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Ratan Singh @ Sher Singh S/o Battu Lal shall be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.PC. in connection with afore-mentioned FIR, provided he furnishes a persona' bond in the sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the following conditions (i) that the accused petitioner will appear before the concerned SHO concerned once in a month till one year for his personal appearance; (ii) that the concerned SHO shall mark attendance of accused petitioner in Rojnamcha, and if the petitioner fails to appear before the concerned police station, the SHO is directed to inform the PR. The learned PP shall move an application under Sec. 439(2) for cancellation of bail of the petitioner in accordance with law; (iii) that the concerned trial court or the Magistrate where the bail bonds are submitted by the petitioner shall send the copy of this order to the concerned SHO immediately; (iv) that the accused petitioner shall appear before the concerned trial court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.