JUDGEMENT
SANGEET LODHA,J. -
(1.) This writ petition is directed against order
dated 18.9.15 passed by the Family Court, Bikaner, whereby an application
preferred by the respondent u/s 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955( in
short "the Act of 1955 ") has been allowed and the petitioner has been
directed to pay a sum of Rs.14,000/- per month as the maintenance pendent
lite to the respondent for herself and the son Naman Jain with effect
from the date of filing of the application and further to pay a sum of
Rs.7,500/- as litigation expenses.
(2.) It is submitted by the learned counsel that the learned court below has seriously erred in directing the petitioner to pay a sum of
Rs.14,000/- per month as interim maintenance to the respondents without
there being any proof about the petitioner's annual income being Rs.25
lacs, as claimed by the respondent. Learned counsel submitted that merely
because the petitioner is paying a sum of Rs.1 lac as annual premium for
life insurance, it cannot be presumed that he is in position to pay the
maintenance to the respondent as claimed by her. It is submitted by the
learned counsel that the respondent has not been able to establish the
fact that she has no independent income sufficient to maintain herself.
(3.) Indisputably, the purpose behind Section 24 of the Act of 1955 is to provide necessary financial assistance to the party to the matrimonial
dispute who has no sufficient means to maintain himself/herself or to
bear the expenses of the proceedings. While considering the application
for award of interim maintenance, the relevant consideration is the
inability of the spouse to maintain himself or herself for want of
independent income or inadequacy of the income to maintain at the level
of social status of other spouse.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.