JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This special appeal is directed against part of the order
of learned Single Judge dated 21.03.2005 in S.B.Civil Writ
Petition No.1528/2005 by which while allowing the writ
petition and issuing direction to the appellant-University to
hold separate examination for the concerned students, the
learned Judge awarded exemplary cost of Rs.10,000/- to
each of the nine petitioners.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that examination forms/fees
were accepted from the writ petitioners for appearing in a
compartmental examination to improve their percentage/
marks. After about five months, their applications were
rejected on the ground that the course of final year had been
amended, and they cannot be permitted to take the
examination. We are of the view that the respondents acted
under completely misconceived notion. The writ petitioners
belonged to 2003-2004 batch and the amended course which
came into force in 2004 could not be applied to them.
(3.) However, it is not necessary to go into that aspect. Pursuant
to the direction of the learned Single Judge, special
examination was held and the writ petitioners were allowed to
appear. At this stage the only question is whether the learned
Judge was justified in awarding cost and if so, to what extent?;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.