JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This writ petition has been submitted by the defendantpetitioners
against the order dated 25.02.2006 (Annex.7) passed by
the Addl. District Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Udaipur refusing their
application under Order 37 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).
(2.) Briefly put, the facts relevant for determination of the
questions involved in this writ petition are that the respondent No.1
has filed a suit against the defendant-petitioners under Order 37
CPC for recovery of an amount of Rs.1,10,000/- and interest on the
principal amount due. According to the plaint averments, there
was a business relationship between the parties where the plaintiff
allegedly leased out a road-roller to the defendant No.1 and the rent
of the said road-roller from the month of September 2003 to May
2004 was due in the defendant No.1 to the tune of Rs.1,10,000/-;
and in discharge of that liability, the defendant No.1 had written
cheque No.413546 dated 31.12.2004 on Allahabad Bank, Sector
No.13 in his account No.1282 and it was also agreed by the
defendant No.2 that if the amount would not be received by the
plaintiff, the house belonging to the defendant No.2 could be put to
sale by the plaintiff for recovery of his due amount.
(3.) Summonses were issued on 17.08.2005 as
contemplated by Rule 2 of Order 37 in the name of petitioners, at
the address of their place of residence, calling upon them to enter
appearance within ten days of service of summons; and as per the
report of the process server, summonses meant for both the
defendants, the present petitioners, were offered to the defendant
No.2 who was found at the given address and on her refusal to
accept, the same were affixed at the house in the presence of two
witnesses, Harpreet Singh and Bhanwar Lal on 24.08.2005.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.