JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This jail appeal is directed against the judgment and
order dated 14-6-2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge,
Churu (for short, the trial Court hereinafter) in Sessions Case
No. 1/2002 (31/2001), whereby the trial Court convicted the
appellant for the offences under Section 328 and 379 IPC and
sentenced him to undergo five years' rigorous imprisonment and
a fine of Rs.500/0, in default of payment of fine further to
undergo three months' rigorous imprisonment for the offence
under Section 328 IPC; and two years' rigorous imprisonment
and a fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine further to
undergo one month's rigorous imprisonment for the offence
under Section 379 IPC. Both the substantive sentences were
directed to run concurrently. Aggrieved by the judgment and
order impugned, the appellant has filed the isntant appeal
through jail.
(2.) I have heard learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant
and the Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. Carefully
gone through the judgment and order impugned, as also the
record of the trial Court.
(3.) On a Parcha-Bayan of PW 1 Mohar Singh, the Police
Station, G.R.P., Churu registered a Crime Report on 29.10.2001
alleging therein that he, alongwith his son Vinod Kumar, who
was to appear in an examination at Jodhpur on 30-10-2001 for
recruitment to Air Force, was to travel in a train. While he was
in the Musafirkhana at the Railway Station, Churu, the appellant
approached him and disclosed his name. Thereafter the
appellant brought two glasses of tea, one glass of tea was given
to the complainant and the another was kept by the appellant.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.