JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Learned counsel requested for adjournment. When
the matter was listed last time on 25.5.2006, request was
made on behalf of learned counsel for passing it over for
the day, and it was assured that the learned counsel would
be available today. Today, another counsel appears to make
a request for adjournment, which I am not inclined to
accept.
(2.) I have perused the impugned award (Annexure-7).
The learned Labour Court has found that workman
had worked in all for three months, and the dispute has
been raised after 14 years. It was also found that Section
25-F is also not attracted, and there is nothing to show
that there is any violation of Section 25-G and H, and
thus, the petitioner has not been found entitled to any
relief.
(3.) In my view, the findings are not vitiated on any
of the grounds available in my writ jurisdiction. The writ
petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.