JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Issue notice for final disposal. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary,
public prosecutor for the State is directed to accept the notice on
behalf of respondent State. He accepts the same.
(2.) By the instant criminal revision petition under Section
397/401 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dated
01.4.2006 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur (for short 'the trial court'
hereinafter) in Sessions Case No. 116/2005, whereby the trial
court declined to decide the application filed by the petitioner
under Section 319 Cr.P.C., and kept the application pending till
statements of prosecution witnesses Mahendra Singh, Smt.
Chanda, Miss Pushpa, Smt. Damyanti, Smt. Sharmila, Smt.
Kamla and doctors who conducted the post-mortem namely Dr.
H.S.Bairwa, Dr. Yogiraj and Dr. Chetna Sharma are recorded.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public
prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned.
(3.) From the perusal of the order impugned, it appears
that the trial court declined to decide the application till the
statements of the witnesses noticed above are recorded by it. If
the application filed by the complainant is contested and decided
after recording the statements of prosecution witnesses noticed
above, by the time, the trial will be almost nearest to the
conclusion, therefore, whether at that stage, it would be proper
to implead the accused sought to be impleaded by the
complainant or not.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.