JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These three petitions filed
under Section 482, Cr. P.C. seek to challenge the order dated 17/11/2005 passed by
the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaipur
City, Jaipur sending the three cases for further investigation to CID (CB), Jaipur under
Section 173(8) of the Cr. P. C.
(2.) The facts of Criminal Misc. Petition
No. 162/2006 are taken as leading case. The
FIR No. 385/2004 on 13-10-2004 in the
aforesaid case was filed by one Mahesh
Kumar Choudhary alleging the offences
under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471,
IPC and also Sections 63, 64 and 67 of the
Copyright Act against the accused petitioners. The complaint in the aforesaid FIR was
that the complainant Mahesh Kumar
Choudhary being partner of M/s. Saraswati
Export, Jaipur had entered into some business agreement with the firm of accused
persons Mr. Surendra Nath Kapoor and Mr.
Vikram Kapoor partners of M/s. S. M.
Kapoor Export, Jaipur who were engaged in
the business of export of carpets. The said
agreement envisaged the manufacture of
carpets as per the designs provided by the
firm of the accused persons and they had
got marketing in the foreign countries for
such carpets and therefore, the complainant agreed to undertake manufacturing
activities as per the consultancy and designs
etc. provided by the accused petitioners and
in consideration of the same, the complainant was to pay consultancy charges/share
in the profit. Under the revised agreement
between the parties from 1/4/2003 instead
of 10% of the sale value, the complainant
was to pay Rs. seventeen lakhs per month
to the accused petitioners. Later on certain
disputes developed between the parties and
the advance cheques given by the complainant to accused petitioners were dishonoured.
It is the case of the complainant that by
manipulating the dates in the cheques the
accused petitioners committed the alleged
offences and accordingly the said FIR was
filed.
(3.) The police after investigation, however, did not find any offence to have been
committed by the accused petitioners and
submitted failure reports in the four FIRs
bearing Mp/357/2004,384/2004 and 386/
2004 filed at Police Station, Brahmpuri,
Jaipur and also FIR No. 168/2004 at Police
Station, Vidhyakpuri, Jaipur. These failure
reports were respectively bearing No. 107
dated 28-10-2004, 108/28-10-2004, 109/
28-10-2004 and 288/2-12-2004. The said
failure report Annexure-2 is on record. Ultimately, police
concluded that the allegations
levelled against the accused petitioners were
false and without any foundation and the
complaint under Sections 182 and 211, IPC
for malicious prosecution was directed to be
filed against the accused petitioners which
is said to be pending.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.