JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This writ petition has been submitted against the order
dated 13.03.1995 passed by the Additional Collector, Sirohi in
Panchayat Revision No.10/1994 whereby the learned
Additional Collector has proceeded to accept the revision
petition submitted by the Panchayat Extension Officer and set
aside the patta granted by Gram Panchayat Sanpur for a
piece of land (measuring 7150 sq.ft.) situated at village
Siyakara.
(2.) According to the petitioners, they were having
possession on the disputed piece of land situated in khasra
No.138 in village Siyakara for about 40-50 years; that by an
order dated 11.01.1983 the land of khasra No.138 was
converted by the Collector, Sirohi for abadi purposes in the
jurisdiction of the Gram Panchayat, Sanpur; that the
petitioners being in possession of the piece of land, applied
for allotment in accordance with the provisions of Rajasthan
Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961 (the Rules of 1961
hereinafter); that the Panchayat by its decision dated
10.08.1986 sold 7150 sq.ft. land to the petitioners under Rule
266 of the Rules of 1961; and the sale made by the
Panchayat was registered before the Sub-Registrar. The
petitioners have asserted that similar allotments were made of
7150 sq.ft. of land to one Jog Singh Rajput and another
13200 sq.ft. land to Jamat Singh Rajput by the same
Panchayat in the same land of khasra No.138. The
petitioners have pointed out that though the allotments were
made in the year 1986, the respondent No.2, the Panchayat
Extension Officer, decided to prefer revision petitions
questioning the validity of the order passed by the Panchayat
allotting the land to the petitioners and so also the aforesaid
two persons. While placing on record copies of such revision
petitions, the petitioners have contended that though similar
nature allegations were made in the revision petitions, the
learned Addl. Collector accepted the revision petitions
preferred against the petitioner and Una but the same
Additional Collector later on rejected the revision petitions in
relation to aforesaid two persons Jog Singh and Jamat Singh.
(3.) The petitioners have further submitted that the order dated
13.03.1995 passed by the Addl. Collector, Sirohi in accepting
the revision petition submitted against them remains illegal for
the learned Additional Collector purporting to exercise his
revisional powers at quite belated stage; that the revision
petition itself was submitted only in the year 1994 i.e. after
about 8 years of allotment of the land; that the land has
continued in possession of the petitioners for about 40-50
years; that the land was validly allotted to them and the sale
deed was registered before the Sub-Registrar, Sirohi.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.