JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This criminal appeal is directed against the Judgment dated
02.07.2002, passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge
No.2, Jodhpur, whereby accused-appellant Harkaram has been
sentenced under Section 307, IPC, to five years' Rigorous
Imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of
fine to further undergo 1 year's Rigorous Imprisonment; under
Section 324, IPC, 1 year"s Rigorous Imprisonment and a fine of
Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further suffer 3
months' Rigorous Imprisonment; and under Section 498-A, IPC,
1 year's Rigorous Imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in
default of payment fo fine to further undergo 3 months' Rigorous
Imprisonment. All the sentences were directed to run
concurrently. It has also been ordered by the learned Additional
District & Sessions Judge, Jodhpur that under Section 357,
Cr.P.C., out of the amount of fine imposed on the accused
Harkaram, a sum of Rs.15,000/- may be paid to Smt.Munki as
compensation.
(2.) Brief facts, giving rise to the instant criminal appeal, are
that on 6.09.1998, Mangilal lodged a report (Ex.P-2) with the
Police Station, Dechu (Jodhpur) that four years ago, his daughter
Smt.Munki was married to Harkaram s/o. Gurubachan Ram,
by caste Mali, R/o. Kallau Rela, Tehsil Shergarh. The 'Gona' of
Smt.Munki was performed after one year of the marriage. It is
further alleged in the report (Ex.P-2) that the date of birth of his
daughter Smt.Munki is 01.01.1979 and she is about 21 years
old. She has studied upto Class V. After performing 'Gona' and
sending to her in-laws' house, a female issue was born out of the
wedlock. Thereafter, his son-in-law started to harass and beat
his daughter. The reason for beating was that why she talks with
her Jethani (elder brother's wife of accused-appellant Harkaram).
(3.) The beating and harassment continued. It was also averred in
the report (Ex.P-2) that about two months ago from the date of
lodging the aforesaid report, i.e., 16.09.1998, when his son-inlaw
gave beating to his daughter, he brought her to village
Bagoria. Thereafter, when the father-in-law and uncle-in-law of
his daughter came to take her, a protest, with regard to illtreatment
being given to his daughter by her husband
Harkaram, was lodged to them, but they expressed their
inability to make Harkaram understand. It was also averred in
the complaint that on 17.08.1998, Mangilal took his daughter
Smt.Munki to her in-laws' house and again lodged a protest with
the father-in-law and uncle-in-law of Smt.Munki with regard to
unnecessary beating being given to his daughter Smt.Munki by
her husband Harka Ram. Then they assured him that now,
they will look after the matter and Smt.Munki will not be given
any beating by her husband Harkaram. Thereafter, he
returned to village Bagoria. On 15.09.1998, at 1.00 P.M., one
Kotharam Jeth of Smt.Munki (victim) came to Mangilal Bhati
(the father of victim) and informed about the ill health of
Smt.Munki. He also informed that Smt.Munki is hospitalised in
Jodhpur. Then, he immediately rushed to the Hospital and found
that his daughter Smt. Munki was admitted in the Emergency
Ward. His daughter Smt.Munki told him that at her in-laws'
house, she was given beating and was administered medicine in
a glass. Thereafter, she became unconscious. When he enquired
about the 'medicine', her Jeth told that he does not know as to
which was the 'medicine', but he has thrown away the glass by
which medicine was given. He also pleaded ignorance whether
the 'medicine' was administered or she (Smt.Munki) took herself it.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.