JUDGEMENT
Harbans Lal, J. -
(1.) This petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against
the common order dated 30.7.1999 passed by the learned Additional
Sessions Judge No. 1, Sikar in Cr. Revision Petition No. 86/96 and 28/97.
Both these revision petitions were filed against a
common order dated 30.7.1996 of the learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danta
Ramgarh, District Sikar vide which cognizance
for offences under Sections 147, 343, 323
and 325/149 IPC was taken against seven
persons. Both these revision petitions were heard
and decided by a common order which is under challenge
in this petition. The learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1
Sikar dismissed Revision No. 28/97 the accused and
allowed Revision No. 86/96 filed by the complainant and in
addition to other offences took cognizance for the offence under
Section 304 Part-I and Part-II IPC and directed the learned
court below to commit the case to the court of
sessions for trial as the said offence was exclusively triable by
the court of sessions.
(2.) The sole contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner
which has not been controverted by the learned Public Prosecutor
for the State and has rather been fairly conceded is that the revisional
court could not have taken cognizance of the aforesaid offence. It
could have at best directed the learned Magistrate to make 'further inquiry'
and to pass fresh order in respect thereof in the light of its observations.
In this regard, reliance has been placed on the case of Nikku Ram & Ors.
v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. in support of his conention:
(3.) I have considered the submissions in the light of the materials on record.
Section 398 of the Code reads as under : -
'395. Power to order inquiry -
On examining any record under section
397 or otherwise, the High Court or
the Sessions Judge may direct the Chief
Judicial Magistrate by himself or by any
of the Magistrates subordinate to him
to make, and the Chief Judicial Magistrate may
himself make or direct any subordinate Magistrate to make, further
inquiry into any complaint which has been dismissed under section 203 or
sub-section (4) of section 204, or into the case of any person accused of an
offence who has been discharged :
Provided that no court shall make any direction under this section for inquiry
into the case of any person who has been discharged unless such person has
had an opportunity of showing cause why such direction should be made.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.