JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The instant criminal revision petition filed under section
397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short `the
Code' hereinafter) is directed against the order dt. 24.11.2005
passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Chittorgarh Camp Begun
(for short `the trial court' hereinafter) in Sessions Case
No.68/2005, whereby the trial court framed the charges against
the petitioners for the offences under sections 452, 307, 307/34,
323 and 323/34 I.P.C.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the
order impugned and challan papers.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his
arguments and challenged the order impugned to the extent
framing of charges against the petitioners for the offences under
sections 307 and 307/34 I.P.C., however, he has not assailed
the order impugned to the extent framing charges against the
petitioners for the offences under sections 452, 323 and 323/34
I.P.C.
(3.) From the perusal of the challan papers, it appears that the
single injury suffered by injured Pappu has been assigned to one
Liyakat, who has not been challaned. Injured Pappu suffered
lacerated wound by blunt object, which is simple in nature.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.