JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal has been filed
by the appellant against the judgment dated
20th April, 1988 passed by the Additional
District Judge and Sessions Judge,
Rajsamand thereby convicting him for offence
under Section 201, IPC and sentencing
him to undergo rigorous imprisonment
of six months with fine of Rs. 300/-, in default
payment whereof to further undergo
one month's simple imprisonment.
(2.) One Devi Singh Karwar resident of
Pasund Kerawaton Ki Bhagal gave an information
to SHO Police Station, Kelwara that
he had heard about a dead body of a woman
lying on side of the road leading from
Lakhmawato Ka Guda to Nathdwara. He
informed that the villagers have assembled
there and the dead body was covered by Sari.
The police on receiving this information,
started an inquiry under Section 174, Cr.
P.C. Panchnama of dead body was prepared
as Exhibit-P/5. On examination of the dead
body, it was found that name Tulshi was
inscribed at the right hand of the deceased
and no external injury was visible. In the
postmortem report Exhibit-P/8, it transpired
that her death was caused by strangulation
and there was fracture of the third cervical
vertebra and compression over lower part
of maduler and spinal cord was visible. The
cause of death was described as asphyxia
following strangulation or throttling. The
police therefore registered a case under Section
302, IPC and commenced the investigation.
During the course of investigation,
police recorded statements of various witnesses
and recovered the Jeep RST 6555
vide Exhibit-P/9 in which the dead body of
the deceased was carried. At the conclusion
of the investigation, the police found that
the neck of the deceased was strangulated
by her husband Vajja and other accused
were with him when her dead body was
taken from the village to the place where
from it was recovered. The police filed the
challan against the accused Vajja for offence
under Section 304/201, IPC and against
other four accused namely Ghasi, Panna Lal,
Bhanshi Lal and Kajju Lal for offence under
Section 201, IPC.
(3.) The prosecution examined ten witnesses
in support of its case and exhibited
as many as 23 documents. On the conclusion
of trial, the leaned Additional District
and Sessions Judge, Rajsamand by his judgment]
dated 24-4-1988 acquitted the accused
Vajja of the charges under section 304/201,
IPC and other accused namely Ghasi, Panna
Lal, Bhanshi Lai of the charge under Section
201, IPC but convicted the accused-
appellant Kajju Lal for offence under Section
201, IPC and sentenced him as indicated above.
Feeling aggrieved by the said
judgment, the appellant has preferred the
present appeal.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.