JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioner by this writ petition seeks to
obtain a direction, that letter dated 24.2.2006
(Annex.5), and circular dated 24.2.2006 (Annex.6), may
be declared illegal and be set aside. The other prayer
made is, that the respondents may be restrained from
introducing Check Off System i.e. deduction of union
membership subscription fees from employees salary,
and that, they may be directed to continue with the
earlier system of secret ballot, for deciding the
majority of membership, for the purpose of recognition,
to the Union.
(2.) The averments of the petitioner are, that the
petitioner is a registered recognised trade union,
having registration No.TU/BHL/3/88. It is alleged, that
vide letter dated 13.5.2003, the Manager (P & IR)
approved recognition to the petitioner in the Rajasthan
Atomic Power Station 1 and 2, for a period of two
years, as a result of recognition by secret ballot. The
letter is produced as Annex.1 and Annex.1-A. It is
alleged, that at Rajasthan Site of the Nuclear Power
Corporation of India Ltd., there are three registered
unions, being the petitioner, Rajasthan Atomic Power
Sharmik Sangh (RAPSS) and third being, Rajasthan
Anushakti Pariyojna Karamchari Sangh (RAPKS). According
to the petitioner, the procedure of secret ballot is
being followed for deciding majority of the membership,
for the purpose of recognition, to function separately
for Rajasthan Atomic Power Station Unit 1 and 2, 3 and
4, 5 and 6. It is then alleged, that the Regional
Labour Commissioner, vide letter dated 27.5.2005
(Annex.2), informed the petitioner-union, that the
Ministry of Labour has decided to collect preliminary
particulars of the Management, and Unions operating in
Rajasthan Atomic Power Project 1 to 6, for the purpose
of verification of membership of the unions, operating
in the project 1 to 6, through secret ballot, and the
petitioner was directed to furnish certain information/
particulars. The petitioner accordingly submitted the
documents, and to the petitioners knowledge, other
unions also submitted the informations. The Regional
Labour Commissioner then held a meeting, on 29.6.2005,
regarding verification of membership, as informed vide
letters Annex.3 and 4. Thus, the Regional Labour
Commissioner has already started the process of
verification of membership of the unions, and the
unions furnished necessary documents. It is alleged,
that the petitioner-union and other unions are in
favour of recognition by secret ballot. It is then
alleged, that the Additional General Manager (H R) of
the respondent-company, vide letter dated 24.2.2006
informed, that the petitioners recognition has
expired, therefore, the management intends to recognise
the union, having majority of the members posted in the
Rajasthan Site, and that, in line of the policy for
recognition of only single union at Rajasthan Site, it
has been decided to introduce the Check Off System,
i.e. deduction of union membership subscription fees
from the employees salary, as it would help in
determining the identity of the union, having largest/
maximum membership strength, and on that basis,
recognition is granted to one union out of the three,
for the Site, for description/negotiations with the
management, on employees welfare matters. It was also
informed therein, that the petitioner and RAPKS have
also agreed for single recognised union at the
Rajasthan Site, for the purpose of negotiation and
discussion. This letter has been produced as Annex.5
and is enclosed.
(3.) It is then alleged, that Additional General
Manager (H R) also issued a circular dated 24.2.2006,
about introduction of Check Off System, giving
details and methods of the said system, i.e. deduction
of union subscription fees on monthly basis, on the
basis of written authority, given by the employee, and
that amount shall be deposited every month, in the bank
account of respective union. According to it, every
employee, desiring to become member of any union, will
have to fill up an authority letter for deduction, as
per the choice of the individual employee for a
particular union, and on the basis of such authority
letter, it will be ascertained, as to which of the
unions has the maximum membership, and the union having
majority membership, shall be recognised. The forms are
to be submitted positively by 20th March 2006. This
letter is produced as Annex.6. According to the
petitioner, immediately thereupon, the petitioner and
RAPKS submitted their protest against introduction of
Check Off System, and about the allegation of the
union having agreed for single recognised union, and it
was alleged, that the unions had only agreed for the
process of recognition through secret ballot. However,
the Check Off System was claimed to be wholly
uncalled for, highly objectionable and unconstitutional.
At the end of para-9 of the writ
petition, containing this pleading, an addition has
been made by hand as under:
Now all the working three consern unions agreed
for secret ballot verification.;