JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This Criminal Appeal under 374 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure is directed against the judgment dated
28.09.2001, passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions
Judge, Hanumangarh, whereby he convicted and sentenced
accused-appellants Mahaveer @ Krishan S/o. Budhram and
Balveer S/o. Jaswant under Section 376 (2) (g), IPC, to ten
years Rigorous Imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- each, in
default of payment of fine, to further undergo 3 months'
Rigorous Imprisonment; and under Section 447, IPC, one
month's Rigorous Imprisonment. All the sentences were directed
to run concurrently. Out of the amount of fine, a sum of
Rs.10,000/- was directed to be paid to victim - Smt.Roshni W/o.
Omprakash as compensation.
(2.) Brief facts, giving rise to the instant appeal, are that on
11.10.2000, at 8.00 P.M., Smt.Roshni W/o. Omprakash, by caste
Jat, aged 25 years, R/o. Kharsadi lodged a verbal report with
the Police Stationm Nohar, District Haunmangarh stating
therein that prior to the two days of the occurrence, her husband
had gone to bring Parani and had not still returned. Her brotherin-
law ('devar') Mahendra Singh is looking after the field. On
the day of the occurrence, she had gone to the field to serve
food to her brother-in-law. He took the lunch and, thereafter, by
leaving her in the field, her brother-in-law (Mahendra Singh)
went to look after another field. The prosecutrix was sitting all
alone in the hut ('Jhompari'), where Mahaveer who is also called
by the name of Krishan S/o. Budhram Jat and Balveer
S/o.Jaswant Jat, both residents of village Kharsadi, came to her.
(3.) Mahaveer cought-hold her hand and fropped her on the ground
and he pulled out the 'nara' of her salvar, which ('nara') was cut
and resulted into two pieces and, thereafter, opened the
underwear and trouser and committed sexual intercourse with
her against her wishes. While the prosecutrix started to raise hue
and cry, he threatened to do her away. In the field, there was
none to hear her hue and cry. After committing sexual
intercourse, when he (Mahaveer) started to leave the place, in
the meanwhile, Balveer (another accused) came to her. He also
forced her and committed sexual intercourse with her against
her wishes. When she (the prosecutrix) against started to raise
hue and cry, the accused (Balveer) threatened her to kill and
committed sexual intercourse with her. After committing the
sexual intercourse, both the accused, i.e., Mahaveer and
Balveer threatened her that in case of disclosing this incident to
anyone, she would be done away by them. When the left the
hut, after committing sexual intercourse with Smt.Roshni (the
prosecutrix), her brother-in-law Mahendra Singh came to the
field, she was found weeping by putting on her clothes properly.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.