TAJ MOHAMMAD Vs. B O R
LAWS(RAJ)-2015-2-166
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on February 20,2015

TAJ MOHAMMAD Appellant
VERSUS
B O R Respondents

JUDGEMENT

ARUN BHANSALI,J. - (1.) THIS writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Board of Revenue ('Board') dated 26.9.2013, whereby the revision filed by the petitioners has been rejected.
(2.) THE petitioners filed a suit for declaration, correction of entries, partition and permanent injunction. Alongwith the suit, an application under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 ('the Act') was filed seeking temporary injunction.
(3.) THE SDO by its order dated 25.5.2009, directed maintenance of status quo regarding the record and the land in dispute till the next date, thereafter, it appears that the order was extended from time to time and by order dated 14.2.2012, the SDO passed a cursory order and confirmed the order dated 25.5.2009 and disposed of the application filed by the petitioners. Feeling aggrieved, the respondents filed appeal before the Revenue Appellate Authority ('RAA'), the RAA came to the conclusion that the SDO without considering the various aspects of the matter wherein as per the revenue record, the respondents and the plaintiffs were having 1/4th share each in the property and everybody was entitled to share in each part of the property and passed the order, which was not proper and set -aside the order dated 14.2.2012 passed by the SDO.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.