BRAHAM SINGH PARIHAR AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
LAWS(RAJ)-2015-5-78
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on May 13,2015

Braham Singh Parihar And Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Writ Petition No.2202/2012 This writ petition has been filed by the petitionersBraham Singh Parihar and Chiman Singh Parihar with the following prayers:- "I. by an appropriate writ, order or direction the impugned order dated 31.1.2012 (Annex.9) passed by the Secretary, Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur and Resolution No.14 dated 21.3.2011 published on 15.4.2011 (Annex.10) are quashed and set aside. I/A. Further by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned order dated 16.6.2011 (Annex.11) passed by the Deputy Secretary, Group-3, Nagariya Vikas Department, Government of Rajasthan may kindly be quashed and set aside. II. Further by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may be directed to maintain the size of road i.e. 100 ft. III. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court considers just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. IV. Costs of the amended writ petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioners."
(2.) It is alleged that the petitioners had khatedari land in Khasra No.58/2, Village Bhadwasiya, Tehsil and District Jodhpur. They applied for change of land use under section 90B of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 from agriculture to residential and surrendered their rights in 12 bighas of land of their khatedari for conversion. In the Master Plan of the City of Jodhpur from 1976 to 1996, the width of the Paota "C" Road, on which the plot was situate, was shown to be 125 ft. wide. In the Sector Plan, the width of the same road i.e. coming from Jaipur road to RTO office and thereafter, from RTO office to Nagaur road (Paota "C" Road), was shown to be 100 ft. The respondent-Jodhpur Development Authority (JDA) issued a public notice on 30.4.2010 in the daily newspapers showing the width of the road as 100 ft.
(3.) It is stated that the petitioners gave a notice through their counsel for removal of encroachments and also claiming the width of the road to be 125 ft., which was arbitrarily and illegally reduced to 100 ft. The petitioners also filed a Civil Suit No.134/2011 for permanent and mandatory injunction for removal of encroachments on the Paota 'C' Road, used as public road. Alongwith the suit, they also made an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. Notices have been issued on the application in the said Civil Suit.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.