JUDGEMENT
SHIV KUMAR SHARMA. J. -
(1.) This writ
petition has been filed with a prayer to provide for suitable medical facilities
at Railway Stations/Platforms and to ensure establishment of stalls/shops of life saving
drugs/medicines at Railway Stations. During the pendency of writ petition following
news item, published on February 30, 2004
in Daily Newspaper, pertaining to one
Netrapal Singh, Chief Legal Assistant of
Railway (Construction), who sustained severe heart attack while travelling from Jaipur
to Kota in 2956 Up Mumbai Super Fast
Train, was brought to the notice of this
Court :-
(Vernacular matter omitted.)
(2.) In order to ascertain as to whether
travel in long distance trains was safe for
sick and old persons and whether measures
to meet out emergent illness were taken or
not, show cause notices were issued to the
respondents. In reply to the show cause
notice additional affidavit has been filed by
Divisional Manager, Jaipur Division stating
therein that the Railways have already provided augmented first aid box consist of life
saving/emergency drugs in long distance
trains. An augmented first aid box is made
available in Pantry Car and another first aid
box is also available with the guards in all
the trains. It is further averred that as per
the Railway Board's order Railway Doctors
were provided in following long distance
trains as a pilot project :-
(i) Rajdhani Express between Delhi- Mumbai 2951 and 2952 Up
(ii) Vaishali Express between Gorakhpur
to Delhi 2553 and 2554 Up
Since November 19, 1996 medical service was provided in Rajdhani Express,
which was consisting of one medical officer,
one male nurse and one attendant. The
above team used to Board train at 16.30 hrs.
from Mumbai Central reaching New Delhi
at 9.55 hrs. Again the same team used to
travel by train from Delhi to Mumbai Central at 8.30 hrs. Six teams were arranged
for this purpose and similar arrangements
were made by providing separate teams for
Vaishali Express. This arrangement continued for nearly four years and during that
period it was found that those teams remained idle except doctors who attended
very minor disease patients for ailment like
back ache, headache, vomiting, dyspepsia,
Bronchitis, Abdominal colic, Common cold
and cough, sore throat, gastritis etc. During this period four serious passengers were
also attended on running train by the team
but they could not survive because of serious disease/critical condition, despite the
best efforts. This resulted in loss of Doctor's
hours in the hospital for large number of
other patients.
(3.) For under-utilisation of the medical
team and their lack of effectiveness was
mainly for the reasons, incorporated in the
affidavit, thus :-
(i) In the running train it is difficult to
record blood pressure, ECG, arrange cardio
pulmonary resuscitation, giving intravenous
injection/infusion, difficulty in auscultation
heart and lungs because the noise of the
trains, which is magnified by the stethoscope.
(ii) Apart from above difficulties it was also
felt that for treatment of different disease, a
specialist is required. At a time specialist of
all the fields cannot be provided in running
train, moreso when it is found that medical
team remains largely unutilised.
(iii) Apart from above difficulties following difficulties were also experienced by the
medical team :-
(a) Passengers demanded medicine of
their own choice;
(b) Interpretation of ECG, even if it is
somehow recorded in absence of specialist
of the field is difficult;
(c) In case of surgical emergency, same
cannot be properly attended in running
train;
(d) Critical passengers require specialist
attention;
(e) Doctors have very limited diagnostic
facilities in running train. There are possibilities of error of judgment. This may not
only make them vulnerable to Consumer
Protection Act, but also be against the interest of patients.
Since the experiment of sending medical
team was not found to be of much use and
the facility was proved not to be of great help
to serious and critical patients. The facility
was discontinued.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.