JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These writ petitions have been
filed by the petitioners against the order
dated 9-4-2004 passed by the permanent
Lok Adalat, Merta by which the permanent
Lok Adalat directed the petitioners to provide
telephone connections to the complainant
non-petitioners, who submitted their
complaint before the permanent Lok Adalat
alleging that the petitioners are not providing
telephone connections to the non-petitioners
mala fidely despite the fact that 28
consumers have already deposited the
amount as demanded by the demand
notices issued to the complainant-non-petitioners.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that non-
petitioner-complainants submitted complaint
before the permanent Lok Adalat that
the petitioners issued the demand notices
for giving telephone connections and in
pursuance of that the complainants deposited
the requisite amount of Rs. 500/- in the year 2001.
The petitioners can provide telephone
connections to the complainants without
any delay but because of ulterior motive,
instead of providing the telephone
connections to the complainants, the officers of the
petitioners have given connections to the
persons of the distant villages.
(3.) The reply was filed on behalf of the
petitioners before the permanent Lok Adalat
stating therein that the complainants' village
is 5.3 kms. away from the telephone
exchange which is situated in the village
Dodiyan and in view of the current
instructions, the telephone connections by
underground cable cannot be given beyond 2.5 kms.
from the telephone exchange, however,
the petitioners are ready to give the
WLL/CDMA/CORRDECT connections. It is also
submitted that at present, the petitioner
have no cable with them as the cable is not
provided by the Circle. It is also submitted
that in case the petitioner will have to lay
down the cable from the village Dodiyan to
village Tehla then it will cost about
Rs.7,00,000/-. In sum and substance,
according to the petitioners, the connections were
not given to the complainants as the
distance of the village from the telephone
exchange is more than 5.3 kms. and the cable
was not available with the department and
it would cost Rs. 7,00,000/-. the permanent
Lok Adalat considered the facts in detail in
its order dated 9-4-2004 and held that the
department failed to produce and document
to prove that village Tehla is 5.3 kms. away
from the village Dodiyan where the telephone
exchange is situated, whereas the complainants
placed on record the certificate of the
Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat evidencing
that the distance between the two villages
is 5 kms. only. It is also observed that even
if it is accepted that the distance between
the two villages as alleged by the petitioners
is correct then it is 5.3 kms. which is only
0.3 km. more than the limit fixed by the
petitioners-department for giving the telephone
connections. The permanent Lok Adalat also
observed that when the BSNL is claiming
that it has provided the telephone
connections in all the villages then the plea of the
BSNL that the telephone connections cannot
be provided to the non-petitioner-complainants,
appears to be a false plea. The
permanent Lok Adalat also observed that the
officers of the petitioners on 25-3-2004
refused to consider the case of giving telephone
connections to the non-petitioner-complainants
merely on the ground that they
submitted the complaint before the permanent
Lok Adalat.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.