JUDGEMENT
N.K.Jain, J. -
(1.) Heard learned counsel
for the parties. The claimants-appellants
have filed this appeal against the judgment/
award dated 17.6.1997 passed by learned
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jaipur
City, Jaipur in M.A.C.T. Case No. 71 of
1996, whereby Claims Tribunal passed an
award for a sum of Rs. 3,74,940 in favour
of the appellants.
(2.) The only contention raised on behalf
of the appellants is that while passing the
award of compensation, it was the duty of
the Tribunal to award interest thereupon
but the Tribunal failed to award the interest on the amount of compensation and no
reason whatsoever has been assigned for
the same. Therefore, the respondents be
directed to pay interest on the amount of
compensation also.
(3.) The present application for compensation was filed under section 163-A of the
Motor Vehicles Act wherein special provisions are described about the payment of
compensation as indicated in the Second
Schedule. Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, specifically authorises the
Tribunal that as and when claim is allowed
by the Tribunal, then it may direct that in
addition to the amount of compensation,
simple interest shall also be paid at such
rate and from such date not earlier than the
date of making the claim as it may specify
in tin is behalf. The word used in section
171: of the Act is 'may' and not 'shall'. So,
Tribunal in exercise of its discretion may
award interest on the amount of compensation from the date of claim petition. Since
Claims Tribunal normally awards interest
from the date of filing of the petition, then
as and when interest is not awarded, then
reasons are required to be recorded for not
awarding the interest. In the present case,
the Tribunal has not recorded any reasons
for not awarding interest. I do not find any
reason for not awarding interest in the facts
and circumstances of the present case.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.