COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. SUNIL TALWAR MURLIDHAR
LAWS(RAJ)-2005-3-70
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on March 30,2005

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Appellant
VERSUS
Sunil Talwar Murlidhar Respondents

JUDGEMENT

RAJESH BALIA, J. - (1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) THE IT Appeal Nos. 39 of 2004 and 48 of 2004 arise out of the order passed by the Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur, dt. 15th July, 2003, deciding the cross -appeals filed by the Revenue as well as by the assessee relating to assessment for the asst. yr. 1994 -95. Hence, they are being heard and decided together. The respondent -assessee is a liquor contractor who has acquired right to trade in alcohol, which is exclusive privilege of the State, relating to retail in bonded country liquor as well as Indian made foreign liquor (IMFL) for the area Jodhpur, Bilara, Shergarh, Baori and Mathania for the accounting period 1993 -94 relevant to the asst. yr. 1994 -95. On 9th Aug., 1995, the assessee filed his return declaring a total income of Rs. 60,83,130. After the return was processed under Section 143(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, notices under Sections 142(1) and 143(3) were issued for framing regular assessment. During the course of inquiry, the AO was of the opinion that while cost of purchases made by the assessee is determinable and also the stocks, but sales being unvouched, as per the auditor's report, are not verifiable and there is no control on the price charged by the assessee on the alcohol vended by him, hence it is not possible to arrive at correct profits on the basis of books of account maintained by the assessee. Hence, he rejected the books of account under Section 145(2) and made a best judgment assessment on the basis of material available with him.
(3.) THE AO vide his order dt. 30th Sept., 1996, has made additions of Rs. 28,40,586 to the net income from the business of country liquor by adopting estimated NP rate or cost incurred by the assessee and Rs. 23,77,744 in case of IMFL as a result arrived at by applying GP rate to an estimated turnover by taking figures of the cost price and the estimated gross rate of profit at the rate of 18.50 per cent. Thus, addition of Rs. 52,18,330 was made in the result declared by the assessee on the aforesaid two counts.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.