MUMTAZ AHMED KHAN Vs. VEENU GUPTA
LAWS(RAJ)-2014-2-97
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on February 05,2014

MUMTAZ AHMED KHAN Appellant
VERSUS
Smt. Veenu Gupta Respondents

JUDGEMENT

R.S. Chauhan, J. - (1.) THE petitioner has filed this contempt petition for non -compliance of the judgment dated 10.9.2007 passed by this Court.
(2.) THE contempt petition has been filed on 9.1.2014. According to Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, a contempt petition has to be filed within a period of one year from the date when the contempt occurs. Therefore, prima facie, this contempt petition is hit by limitation, as it has been filed after an inordinate delay of six and a half years. Mr. Amin Ali, the learned counsel for the petitioner has pleaded that repeatedly he had brought the judgment dated 10.9.2007 to the notice of the respondent -contemnor and repeatedly the respondent -contemnor had been assuring him that the judgment would be implemented. According to him, the last communication received by him is of 18.12.2009. Therefore, the period of limitation should be counted from the said date. Hence, according to him, contempt petition is well within the period of limitation. Moreover, according to him, since, the petitioner happens to be a poor person, he could not approach the court in time. Furthermore, he does concede that the petitioner had pursued his remedy under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act, and that the petitioner has been reinstated on the post of Assistant -cum -Chowkidar on daily wages.
(3.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.