JUDGEMENT
ARUN BHANSALI, J. -
(1.) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated
16.1.2012 passed by the trial court, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII, Rule 11 (d) CPC has been
rejected.
(2.) THE facts in brief may be noticed thus : the respondent No.1 Mangi Lal filed a suit for permanent injunction and
declaration in relation to a bore -well, water pump and electricity
connection claiming 1/8th share in the said well, motor and
electricity connection situated at Araji No.2968. It was inter -alia
claimed in the plaint that the land in question originally
belonged to Ram Narayan, Satya Narayan and their brothers
Surya Prakash and Om Prakash. Out of the said land, Om
Prakash sold the land to Smt.Hangami Devi and Surya Prakash
sold 1/8th portion to the plaintiff and 1/8th portion to the
defendant No.6 Bhanwar Lal. The bore -well etc. are situated in
land belonging to Smt. Hangami Devi and an agreement dated
2.7.2009 was executed by said Smt. Hangami Devi in favour of Ram Narayan, Satya Narayan, Om Prakash and Surya Prakash, it
was indicated that the said bore -well etc. were joint property of
all the four and that as she has purchased rights of Om Prakash,
all other three persons shall continue to have the right qua the
said bore -well etc. The 1/8th portion was purchased by the
plaintiff on 3.12.2010. It was, inter -alia, alleged in the plaint that
as the respondents are seeking to interfere in the enjoyment of
the said bore -well etc., it has become necessary to seek
inclusion of his name in the electricity connection with the Ajmer
Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited and for that purpose, the suit was
filed.
On filing of the suit, the petitioner herein filed an application under Order VII, Rule 11(d) CPC, inter -alia, claiming
that in view of the provisions of Section 207 of the Rajasthan
Tenancy Act, 1955 ('the Act'). The said suit was barred by law
and as such, the same deserves rejection.
(3.) THE application was opposed by the plaintiff and it was, inter -alia, submitted that besides other rights, the plaintiff has
easementary right qua the said bore -well etc.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.