JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE instant appeal is directed against the judgment cum award dated 15.1.2013 passed by learned Judge, Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaitaran, District Pali in MAC
No.21/2009 whereby the learned Tribunal accepted the claim
application filed by the claimants and awarded them a
compensation holding the appellant insurance company jointly
and severally liable to satisfy the award.
(2.) IT is against the said direction of holding the insurance company jointly and severally liable to satisfy the
award, that the instant appeal has been preferred by the
appellant insurance company.
The appeal is time barred by 73 days. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been
filed by the appellant for condonation of the delay.
I have heard the arguments advanced by Shri
Muktesh Maheshwari learned counsel for the appellant on the
application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act as well as on
the merits of the case.
(3.) AT the outset, it may be mentioned that the reasons mentioned in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation
Act are far from convincing and unacceptable. Thus, tested on
the touch stones of the principles laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Office of the Post Master Vs.
Living Media Ltd., reported in AIR 2012 SC 1506, it is not a fit
case to condone the gross and undue delay of 73 days in filing
of the appeal.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.