JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE instant appeal is preferred by the appellant insurance company against the judgment cum award dated
1.12.2011 passed by learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sojat, District Pali in MAC No.98/2010 whereby the
learned Tribunal whilst accepting the claim application filed by
the respondent claimant Jiya Bai, a compensation of
Rs.98,000/ - was awarded to her towards the injuries received
by her in an vehicular accident.
(2.) WHILST awarding the compensation, the owner and driver of the insured vehicle were held jointly and severally
liable to satisfy the award. However, the appellant insurance
company was given a direction to satisfy the award upfront
and thereafter, was given liberty to recover the amount from
the owner by filing execution proceedings. It is against the
said direction that the appeal has been preferred by the
appellant insurance company.
I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and have gone through the impugned judgment.
(3.) THE learned Tribunal whilst considering the issues raised before it held that the insurance company was entitled
to the defences under Section 149(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act
regarding the breach of the policy conditions in view of the
fact that the driver of the offending vehicle was not holding a
licence of appropriate category. The insurance company
accordingly was exonerated of the liability to indemnify the
award. However, in light of the decision rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance
Co.Ltd. Vs. Swaran Singh & Ors. reported in AIR 2004 SC
1531, the only appropriate direction looking to the claimant's interests was to direct the appellant insurance company to pay
the compensation and thereafter recover the same from the
owner by way of execution proceedings. That is what exactly
and rightly has been done by the Tribunal in this case.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.