JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE instant batch of petitions seek to impeach the constitutional
validity of the amendment to Rule 273 of the Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 (for
short, hereafter referred to as 'the Rules'), effected by the Notification
No.F.4(7)/Ame./Rules/Legal/PR/2012/107, dated 29.01.2013. A writ of
mandamus, or order, or direction directing the State -respondents to consider
the candidature of the employees working as Secretary, Water Shed
Committees, (for short, hereafter referred to as 'the Committee') under the
scheme of the National Water Shed Programme by treating them to be at par
with other employees working under MGNREGA in the process of recruitment
involved has been prayed for as well.
(2.) WE have heard Mr. Nawal Singh Sikarwar, Mr. H.P. Singh, Mr.
Laxmi Kant Sharma and Mr. Imran Khan, the learned counsel for the
petitioners and Mr. S.K. Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Gaurav Tanwar, Advocate, for the State -respondents.
The pleaded case of the petitioners barring fringe variations is
strikingly common and, therefore, the foundational facts have been culled
from D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5861/2013. On an analogy of reasoning, the
stand of the official respondents as available in their reply in this
proceeding, would be adverted to.
(3.) THE petitioners are presently working as Secretary, Water Shed
Committees (for short, hereafter referred to as 'the Committees'),
constituted under the National Water Shed Development Programme,
administered with the Central Government and the State Government
jointly. They had been appointed by the respective Gram Panchayats in the
meetings of the Gram Sabhas, as claimed by them, as per the terms ,
conditions and the guidelines issued by the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj
Department. On an average, the petitioners are serving in this capacity for
last 5 to 6 years. They have stated that the committees are duly registered
with the Registrar of the society under the Rajasthan Societies Registration
Act, 1958 (for short, hereafter referred to as 'the 1958 Act'). They have
asserted that these committees are working under the Panchayati Raj
Institutions in rural areas and performing duties in the fields of engineering,
animal husbandry, agriculture and social science and as the Secretary of the
Committee, they have to maintain the accounts/ledger, check book
register, receipt register, measurement book, muster roll, stock register
etc. Referring to the Circular No..17(28 -)//7455 -8054, dated
29.09.2004, enumerating the works to be performed, amongst others, by the secretary of such committee, the petitioners have pleaded that they
have been religiously discharging their duties to the satisfaction of all
concerned. They have mentioned of the Office Order No.F.19(123)/
DWDSC/MOAP/09 -10/2201 -2516, dated 03.08.2009, whereby remunerations
of the Water Shed Development Team (for short, hereafter referred to as
'the WDT') and the Secretary of the water shed committees have been
enhanced. That the Department of the Rural Development and Panchayati
Raj, Government of Rajasthan had issued circulars from time to time for
conducting the affairs of the water shed committees and sub committees
and that the petitioners are scrupulously adhering to the guidelines in
connection therewith, has been categorically stated. In this regard, the
petitioners have also referred to, in particular, the Office Order No. 18
//2011/4721 -5178,
( -66) dated 08.03.2011,
circulating the guidelines for streamlining the works of the water shed
committees.;