JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) HEARD Ms.Ritu Somani, learned counsel for the petitioner.
(2.) THE instant petition has been laid for initiating a public interest
litigation seeking the following reliefs : -
1. All children who have developed paralytic polio disease during the National Polio Eradication Campaign can be given appropriate compensation depending upon the degree of residual handicap. 2. All children who have developed polio disease by OPV be labeled as cases of polio disease and be included in Table 2 (classification of AFP cases and key surveillance indicators (Annexure -15). 3. As cases of polio disease may occur in future also so instead of 'Polio Free Country' India should be declared as 'Wild Polio Virus Free Country'.
The petitioner claims to have actively participated in the National
Polio Eradication Program, besides associating himself with different
expert groups, including National Certification Committee for Polio
Eradication (NCCPE). It has been averred that the World Health
Assembly, during its 41st Meeting held in 1988, vide its resolution No.28
required the World Health Organization (WHO) to achieve global polio
eradication by the year 2000, exclusively by the use of 'Oral Polio
Vaccine' (for short, hereafter referred to as 'OPV'). Contending that there
exists another type of polio vaccine, nomenclatured as 'Inactivated Polio
Vaccine' (for short, hereafter referred to as 'IPV'), the petitioner has
pleaded that the OPV has its own drawbacks and limitations, so much so,
that it does not provide protection to some children, especially in
developing countries and countries with a hot climate, and that, it
sometimes back mutate, become neurotoxic, and can cause polio
disease. The petitioner has averred that Pulse Polio Immunization
Progamme, whereunder OPV had been administered, was started in the
year 1995. In 1997, Indian Academy of Pediatrics, the Academic Body of
Child Specialist in India integrated itself with the government efforts for
polio eradication. According to the petitioner, he had been raising the
issue of poor performance of OPV and high number of Vaccine Associated
Paralytic Poliomyelitis (for short, hereafter referred to as 'VAPP') cases
caused due to the administration of OPV and the consequent need of
infusion of IPV to curb the same. He has stated that meanwhile, he has
addressed a letter dated 9.6.2000 to this effect to Dr.Shoben Sarkar,
Assistant Commissioner, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare,
Government of India, New Delhi. That a copy of this letter has also been
sent to Hon.General Secretary, Indian Academy of Pediatrics, Mumbai,
has been stated as well. The issue of administration of IPV, as suggested
by the petitioner however, did not receive affirmative response, instead,
in a publication titled "Together we make Indian Polio Free" published
jointly by UNICEF and Indian Academy of Pediatrics, it was inter alia
recorded that public discussion of VAPP would cause serious damage to
the credibility of the polio eradication strategy, and that, in the present
scheme, VAPP was discarded as 'non -polio'. While admitting that such a
view might be justified on the ground that the Polio Eradication Program
would benefit the whole world, the petitioner has contended that an
adequate compensation scheme needs to be put in place for those
harmed by such program. This indeed, is the thematic foundation of the
present petition, seeking the above quoted reliefs.
(3.) THE petition discloses that meanwhile, the petitioner has
submitted a representation titled "Compensation for Polio Cases" dated
20.5.2013 before the Central Government, and has also forwarded a memorandum dated 5.8.2013 on the same issue to the Secretary,
National Human Rights Commission, New Delhi. However, according to
him, there has been no response to his representation/memorandum, as
yet.;