JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THESE two instant appeals are filed by the owner of the offending vehicle against the judgment cum award dated
24.11.2011 passed by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -I, Jodhpur in MAC No.415/2009 and
628/2009 whereby the claim applications filed by the claimants respondents under Section 166 of the Motor
Vehicles Act were allowed and the claimants respondents were
awarded compensation and holding the insured to be in the
breach of policy conditions and applying the principle of 'pay
and recover' liberty was given to the insurance company to
recover the amount of compensation from the appellant owner
by filing execution proceedings after satisfying the award.
(2.) BEING aggrieved of the said direction of pay and recover that the appellant owner has approached this Court by
way of the instant appeals.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the insuracne company and the learned counsel
for the claimant.
(3.) SHRI Roshan Lal learned counsel appearing for the appellant vehemently contends that the burden of proving the
defences regarding the breach of policy conditions lies on the
insurance company. The burden was not discharged
appropriately and thus, the learned Tribunal was unjustified in
exonerating the insurance company from the joint and several
liability to satisfy the claim. He submits that the appellant
owner of the vehicle was not aware that the driver not having a
licence of appropriate category authorising him to drive the
pickup vehicle, which is a transport vehicle. Thus, he submits
that the direction in the judgment cum award whereby the
insurance company was exonerated of the liability to satisfy
the award be quashed and the insurance company be made
jointly and severally liable to satisfy the award alongwith the
owner and driver.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.