JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE instant writ petition has been filed by Union of India through the Secretary Government of India, Ministry of
Communication, Department of Post and others under Article
227 of the Constitution of India to challenge the judgment dated 29.08.2013 (Annx.4) passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur in O.A. No.252/2012 whereby while
quashing impugned orders dated 16.4.2012 (Annexure -A/1) and
19.5.2011 (Annexure.A/2), the Tribunal passed an order to refund the amount recovered from the respondent applicant
within six months.
(2.) AS per facts of the case, the respondent while working in the capacity of PA (SOSB) Jodhpur failed to perform
his duties as Supervisory check of SB transaction list dated
4.8.2007 received from Phalodi S.O. and due to his negligence, two main offenders of Phalodi Fraud Case succeeded to commit a
fraud to the tune of Rs.2 crores. The respondent applicant was
appointed as Postal Assistant in the year 1991. Thereafter, he
worked at several places as Postal Assistant under the control of
Superintendent of Post Offices, Jodhpur. When he was posted at
SOSB Jodhpur HO, a fraud case was lodged against two officials
of Phalodi Post Office, and FIR was also lodged against him.
According to the respondent applicant, no role was alleged for offence of mis -appropriation by the officials of Phalodi Post Office
against the respondent applicant and case is pending before CBI
Courts against those persons but the Department passed the
impugned order or recovery of Rs.50,000/ - without fixing his
liability. In the Original Application, it is specifically pleaded by
the respondent applicant that the respondents has failed to
assess the loss caused by the applicant to the Department but
recovered the amount without any basis, therefore, the recovery
of Rs.5o000/ - is against the principle of natural justice.
(3.) THE respondent applicant pleaded in the application filed before the Tribunal that the punishment order has been
passed illegally without fixing any liability because the applicant
has no role in the fraud committed at Phalodi Post Office,
therefore, the order of recovery of Rs.50,000/ - may be quashed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.