JUDGEMENT
Dalip Singh, J. -
(1.) These appeals arise
out of the same award dated 2.2.1995
passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dausa
arising out of Claim Petition
No. 6 of 1993 filed by the appellant on
account of death of Prabhat Singh, husband
of Kashi Behan appellant No. 1 and father
of appellant Nos. 2 to 7 in Claim Petition
No. 7 of 1993 filed by Chattar Singh and
his wife for the death of their son Upendra
Singh who died as a result of the motor
accident involving jeep No. GJ 17-A 7763
in which the deceased were travelling and
which was struck by the truck No. PB 10-E 9109.
As a result of the said accident
the deceased persons Prabhat Singh and
Upendra Singh received multiple injuries
and died as a result thereof. Since these
two appeals are arising out of the same
award, therefore, they are being heard and
decided together.
C.M.A. No. 517 of 1995:
(2.) The submission of the learned counsel for
the appellants is that in the case of
C.M.A. No. 517 of 1995 filed by Kashi
Behan for the death of Prabhat Singh is
concerned, learned Tribunal has assessed
the dependency while determining the loss
of income as Rs. 2,600 per month and
adopted a multiplier of 5 which is wholly
inadequate and contrary to the provisions
contained in Second Schedule to the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988. Learned counsel for
appellants further submits that as per the
case of appellants, the age of the deceased
was 45 years and in such cases, a multiplier
of 13 ought to have been adopted.
(3.) On the other hand, learned counsel
for the respondents submits that no proof
of age has been submitted by the appellants, the
deceased was a conductor with
Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation
and from his service record, the certificate
of age could have been produced and that
was the best evidence available with the
appellants. Since the appellants have failed
to produce the evidence available to them,
the finding of the Tribunal with regard to
the age of the deceased was 56 years which
has been arrived at on the basis of the postmortem
report, Exh. 3 of the deceased
wherein the age of the deceased has been
given as 56 years and a multiplier of 11 as
per the provisions of Second Schedule to
the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 could at best
be adopted.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.