JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) INSTANT writ petition has been filed by the
petitioner for quashing order dated 21.09.2010
(Annex.-7) passed by respondent No.1 whereby the
respondent No.1 rejected the case of the petitioner for
providing appointment on compassionate ground for
the reason that unmarried sister is not included in the
definition of "dependent" in the Rajasthan
Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of
Deceased Government Servants Rules 1996 and
further prayed that the respondents may be directed
to provide appointment on compassionate ground
because the petitioner is unmarried sister of deceased
government servant late Kanti Prasad Pandit who was
working as Junior Judicial Assistant in the High Court
and died while in service on 28.06.2010.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's father late Daulal Pandit (Harijan) died
and, thereafter, petitioner along with two other sisters
was living with their widow mother and brother late
Kanti Prasad Pandit who was working as Junior Judicial
Assistant in the Copying Section of the Rajasthan High
Court. The whole family was dependent upon late
Kanti Prasad Pandit, therefore, after his death the
petitioner being unmarried sister of late Kanti Prasad
Pandit preferred an application for providing
appointment on compassionate ground but the
respondent Rajasthan High Court rejected the
application of the petitioner for providing appointment
on compassionate ground.
According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Herald
Hamilton Vs. State of Rajasthan, reported in 1988 (1)
RLW 142, interpreted the definition of "family", in
which, it is held that definition of "family" is flexible,
therefore, in the event of death of brother or sister,
application can be considered for providing
appointment under the rules on compassionate ground
if it is found that the family members were dependent
upon the government employee.
(3.) IN this case, the petitioner being unmarried younger sister and dependent upon late Kanti Prasad
Pandit is very much entitled to get appointment on
compassionate ground because in our country after
the death of the father only protection is available for
the unmarried girls to live with her brother or mother
and they are required to be treated as dependent
upon the brother and/or mother and the brother is
required to treat the younger unmarried sister as
daughter to perform the duty of protection of the life
of the unmarried sister. Therefore, the rejection of
the petitioner's candidature is totally illegal, therefore,
prayer is made that communication impugned may be
quashed and respondents may be directed to provide
appointment to the petitioner being unmarried sister
of late Kanti Prasad Pandit upon any post available in
the High Court in the cadre of Class IV employee.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.