JUDGEMENT
MATHUR,J. -
(1.) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and
order dated 26.4.2006 passed by learned Additional Sessions
Judge (Fast Track), Banswara convicting and sentencing the
accused appellants as under:-
Accused Shankar Lal -
u/S.302 IPC Life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.2000/-
and in default of payment of fine further to undergo six
months simple imprisonment.
u/S.323 IPC Three months simple imprisonment.
Accused Jhumaklal @ Jhumanlal, Beerbal and Suresh Chandra
u/S.302/34 IPC - Life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.2000/-
and in default of payment of fine further to undergo six
months simple imprisonment to each.
u/S.323 IPC Three months simple imprisonment to each.
(2.) IN brief, facts of the case are that on 4.9.2005 at about 11:00 PM a statement given by Shri Devilal (PW-3)
at Koba Choraha was reduced in writing by a police team of
Police Station Anandpuri and on basis of that a case was
lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 147,
148, 149 and 323 Indian Penal Code. As per the statement given by Shri Devilal M/s Bharat, Dhaneshwar and Rajmal
came to his shop on two different motorcycles at about
08:30 PM on 4.9.2005. Dhaneshwar had a cigarette from the shop and then he moved towards his motorcycle. At that time
Jhumanlal @ Jhumaklal and four other persons came there and
caught hold of Bharat and his friends. They started
quarrelling with them and put down Bharat on earth and then
gave stone blows. The assailants fled from the spot when
Magan, Raman etc. came there.
During the course of treatment Bharat died, therefore, investigation was initiated for an offence
punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code also. The
investigating agency after completing the investigation
submitted a police report before the competent court and
the case then was committed to the court of Sessions. On
17.11.2005 the accused appellants were charged for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 323, 324, 302 read
with 120-B Indian Penal Code. On denial of the charges,
trial commenced as desired.
(3.) THE prosecution supported its case with the aid of 19 witnesses out of whom Devilal (PW-3), Rajmal (PW-4),
Dhaneshwar (PW-5), Ganeshlal (PW-6) and Ramlal (PW-7) were
cited as eye witnesses. Dr. S.K.Bhatnagar (PW-15) conducted
autopsy on the person of deceased Bharat and Dr. Devendra
Verma (PW-16) examined injuries of Rajmal and Dhaneshwar,
therefore, they substantiated the medical evidence advanced
by the prosecution. The testimony of Shri Prithvi Singh
(PW-19) was also examined and he narrated all the steps
taken during the course of investigation being
investigating officer. The postmortem report (Ex.P/15) and
injury reports of Devilal, Rajmal and Dhaneshwar Ex.P/6,
Ex.P/7 and Ex.P/8 and the report given by Forensic Science
Laboratory (Ex.P/26) were exhibited alongwith other
documents prepared by the investigating agency during the
course of investigation. While explaining the adverse
circumstances and incriminating material available in
prosecution evidence, the accused appellants termed the
entire prosecution evidence as false and pleaded their
innocence. In defence statements of Shri Ambalal (DW-1) and
Subhash Patidar (DW-2) were recorded. The documents D/1 to
D/6 were also exhibited in defence. The trial court after
examining the entire evidence available on record arrived
at the conclusion that the accused appellants participated
in the crime in question and, therefore, convicted and
sentenced them. One accused Jayantilal was acquitted from
all the charges.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.