JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS writ petition has been preferred by
the petitioner against the order dated 02.08.2013
passed by Additional Civil Judge (JD) No.6, Jodhpur
Metropolitan (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter),
whereby several applications preferred by the
petitioner under section 151, Order 6 Rule 5 read
with section 151, section 30 CPC read with Order
16 Rule 14 and 15 read with section 151 CPC, Order 26, Rule 10A read with section 151, Order 13
Rule 10 CPC read with section 151 CPC have been
rejected.
(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that respondent -Sushil Agarwal filed a suit for specific
performance of contract against the petitioner and
other defendants, which is pending before the trial
court since 1991. When the plaintiff failed to
appear before the learned trial court on several
occasions for cross -examination by the opposite
party on the affidavit filed by him in support of the
suit, the learned trial court vide order dated
19.05.2007 has closed the evidence of the respondent -plaintiff while observing that if on the
next date, the plaintiff produces documents
regarding his treatment in connection with the
accident, due to which he failed to appear before
the Court, he is entitled to give his evidence. The
matter was fixed for 21.07.2007 for recording the
evidence of the defendants. On 21.07.2007, the
respondent -plaintiff moved an application under
section 151 CPC along with an affidavit and
produced the documentary evidence regarding his
treatment in connection with the alleged accident.
The learned trial court, after taking into consideration the said application and the
objections filed by the defendants, has passed the
order dated 04.12.2007 and allowed the
respondent -plaintiff to produce his remaining
evidence on the next date of hearing and the
matter was fixed for evidence of the plaintiff on
11.01.2008.
(3.) THE petitioner -Sajjan Raj - defendant No.3, in the suit, filed a first information report
regarding forged and fabricated medical certificates
filed by Sushil Agarwal before the learned trial
court for the purpose of producing his evidence and
for which, the learned trial court has passed the
order dated 04.12.2007, before Police Station,
Udaimandir, Jodhpur. In that criminal case, the
police, after investigation, has found that the
medical certificates produced by the petitioner are
forged and fabricated and hence, filed charge -sheet
against respondent -Sushil Agarwal for the offences
punishable under sections 465 and 471 IPC before
the competent criminal court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.