JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS appeal has been preferred by the appellant
against the judgment and award dated 8.3.2000 passed
by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sri
Ganganagar (hereinafter referred to as 'the learned
Tribunal') in Claim Case No.284/1994 whereby
claimants were awarded a compensation of Rs.50,000/ -
under no fault liability.
(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that on 30.7.1993 at about 5:15 PM bus No.RJ -14 -P -2981 owned by the
appellant and driven by Swarn Singh collided with two
trucks on Hanumangarh -Ganganagar road near Lalgarh
and in that accident, the driver of bus Swarn Singh and
several other persons were died and many other
persons were injured. A claim petition was preferred on
behalf of wife and children of Swarn Singh, Driver of the
bus No.RJ -14 -P -2981 owned by appellant demanding
the claim of Rs.9,85,088/ -. The learned Tribunal has
held that as the accident, in which driver of the bus
Swarn Singh died, took place on account of his
negligence and, therefore, the wife and son of Swarn
Singh (respondent -claimants) are not entitled for any
compensation. However, the learned Tribunal has
awarded a compensation of Rs.50,000/ - to the
respondent -claimants under no fault liability as per
Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The appellant has assailed the validity of the impugned judgment and award by way of this appeal.
(3.) THE learned counsel for the appellant has argued that once the learned Tribunal has held that the accident
took place on account of fault of Swarn Singh, who was
driving the bus No.RJ -14 -P -2981, no compensation
under no fault liability can be awarded to the
respondent -claimants under Section 140 of the Act of
1988. The learned counsel for the appellant has, therefore, prayed that the impugned judgment and
award to this extent is liable to be quashed and set
aside as the same is contrary to the provisions of the
Motor Vehicles Act.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.