JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS appeal is directed against the award dated 15.11.2011
passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rajsamand ('the
Tribunal'), whereby the Tribunal has awarded a sum of
Rs.6,95,000/- as compensation to the claimants-respondents.
(2.) THE principal ground of attack in the present appeal filed by the Insurance Company is that the driver of the offending
vehicle was not in possession of effective and valid driving
licence and on account of violation of policy condition, the
appellant-Insurance Company is not liable for payment of
compensation.
The Tribunal while deciding Issue No.4 has came to a conclusion that though the appellant-Insurance Company had
issued notices Ex.A/2 and Ex.A/3 to the driver and owner of the
vehicle for production of the driving licence, however, as the said
notices were issued after a passage of almost seven years from
the date of accident and the same were returned unserved on
account of incomplete address / addressee not available at given
address. The same cannot lead to a conclusion that the owner
and driver have failed to produce the driving licence and the
Insurance Company has discharged its burden.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the appellant submitted that besides the fact that the notice given to the owner and driver was not
delivered the licence of the driver was not available in the police
papers and therefore, the presumption, thus, arise that the
driver was not in possession of valid and effective driving licence.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.