JUDGEMENT
DINESH MAHESHWARI, J. -
(1.) THOUGH the Official Liquidator has attempted to suggest
want of a specific order of appointment qua the company in
liquidation but could not deny that by virtue of Section 449 of
the Companies Act, 1956 ['the Act'], upon a winding up order
having been made in respect of a company, the Official
Liquidator attached to this Court, becomes the liquidator of the
company in question.
(2.) HOWEVER , to put the record straight, it is made clear that the Official Liquidator attached to this Court is the Official
Liquidator in respect of the company in liquidation per the
force of winding up order dated 16.12.1998 passed in
Company Petition No. 10/1998.
The Company, Gurushikhar Savings and Investment Ltd., having been ordered to be wound up by the aforesaid order
dated 16.12.1998, the Official Liquidator has filed this
application with the submissions that after establishment of his
new office, there is no panel of Chartered Accountants
available with him at Jodhpur to pursue various tasks, like
those of scrutiny of statement of affairs, adjudication of claims,
finding out instances of misfeasance etc. It is further
submitted that the report/s under Sections 542 and 543 are
required to be made and the same is/are required to be
submitted before the Court on or before 15.12.2013 wherefor,
the services of a Chartered Accountant are required,
particularly to scrutinize the accounts and to find out the
instances of misfeasance in company in liquidation. The
Official Liquidator has, therefore, made a prayer for approving
appointment of a Chartered Accountant to investigate and
report on the acts of the officers of the company in liquidation
for the purpose of Section 543 (1) of the Act and for making
payment to the Chartered Accountant from various companies
fund.
(3.) MR . Satya Dev Sharma, one of the Directors of the Company in liquidation, has filed a reply to the application with
the submissions that the business of the company was not
carried out after the month of June 1997 and, for the period
upto 1996, the accounts were duly audited. It is also submitted
that one of its Directors at Jaipur lost the record of the
company and report in that regard was made before the police
authorities of Sindhi Camp Police Station, Jaipur. It is also
submitted that the answering respondent has filed the
company petition for protection of the properties of the
company and has been actively co operating in the matter. It
is submitted that by the earlier order, the Official Liquidator
was directed to take over the charge of the properties of the
company in liquidation; and was also permitted to investigate
into the affairs of the company; and an amount of Rs. 15,000/
was also deposited in that regard. The non applicant submits
that he is ready to co operate to the full extent but the
services of Chartered Accountant will cause additional
financial burden on the company in liquidation and hence, it is
prayed that the application moved by the Official Liquidator
may be declined.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.