JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE petitioner was subjected to a disciplinary
action as per the Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Civil Services
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 under a
memorandum dated 07.12.2011 issued by the Director,
Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner for an allegation that
in the educational session 2004-2005, when he was posted as
Principal, Government Secondary School, Rohida (Banswara),
the result of the school remained 18.60%, that is less than the
norms settled by the Department of Education, as such, the
petitioner failed to discharge his administrative duty
effectively.
(2.) AN explanation was submitted by the petitioner with assertion that he made his best efforts to avail good result,
but due to certain unavoidable circumstances, the same did
not came as per expectations. The disciplinary authority,
thereafter, under an order dated 22.05.2012 imposed a
penalty of censure upon the petitioner. A challenge given to
that by way of filing an appeal came to be rejected under an
order dated 31.12.2012.
While challenging the order passed by the appellate authority as well as the disciplinary authority, it is submitted
by learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the law laid
down by this court in the cases of Ashok Kumar Kulhari Vs.
State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in 2009 WLC (Raj.) UC 53
and Hari Kishan Sharma Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Anr.
reported in 2013 (2) WLN 175 (Raj.) , no disciplinary action
could have been taken against the petitioner merely on the
ground that the result of the school had been reduce.
(3.) PER contra as per the respondents the petitioner was penalized with minimum penalty of censure and that too
after considering the fact that the result of the Secondary
School Examination came down than the standard prescribed
by the Department of Education. It is pointed out that in the
year subsequent, the result came to be increased upto 90%
and this fact is sufficient enough to establish that if the
petitioner would have put adequate efforts, the result of the
school would have not gone down.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.