ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER Vs. SOMANI MILLS
LAWS(RAJ)-2013-8-53
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on August 29,2013

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER Appellant
VERSUS
Somani Mills Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) SINCE common issues and questions of law are involved in all these three revision petitions under Section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act 1994 (for short, 'the Act of 1994'), therefore, all of them are heard together and being disposed of by this common order.
(2.) AT the threshold, while admitting all these revision petitions, the question of law was not framed but during the course of hearing, the following question of law has emerged for determination: "Whether the learned Tax Board was justified in construing Notifications dated 13th of June 1994 and 20th of March 1997 for arriving at a conclusion that woolen carpet yarn is exempted from tax?" In the first revision petition bearing S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No.21 of 2005, the impugned order of the learned Tax Board pertains to the assessment year 1995-96 whereas in two other connected revision petitions, the order of assessment is of assessment year 1996-97. Taking into account the fact that common question of law is involved in all these revision petitions, for the sake of convenience, the factual matrix giving rise to all these cases, as alleged in S.B. Sales Tax Revision No.21 of 2005, are set out hereinafter.
(3.) SUCCINCTLY stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent-assessee is a manufacturer of carpet woolen yarn and for the assessment year 1995-96 it has submitted four quarterly returns showing total sale of Rs.2,95,77,801.85. As per the Revenue, the assessee deposited a deficit tax for a sum of Rs.68,895/-, for which the assessee has claimed 4% set off of the tax on the anvil that woolen carpet yarn is a raw wool, which is exempted from tax by virtue of Notification dated 13th of June 1994 issued by the Government under Section 4(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 as well as Notification dated 20th of March 1997 issued by the Government under Section 15 of the Act of 1994. The Assessing Authority, after examining the notifications, refused to concur with the contention of the assessee and fastened tax liability on the assessee and also imposed interest on the deficit amount of tax.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.