JUDGEMENT
NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN, DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ. -
(1.) THE petitioner is present-in-person with his wife and mother.
Respondent No. 8 is also present-in-person. The Investigating
Officer Mr. Shravan Kumar, ASI is also present-in-person.
(2.) THE daughter of the petitioner has appeared before us alongwith the respondent No. 8, who is said to be carrying alias
Narendra alias Satveer.
We have conferred with the daughter of the petitioner in camera where she asserted having gone with the respondent No.
8 of her own accord and that she is residing with him at her sweet will. She, in the first place, declined even to talk to her parents but
on being persuaded, agreed to do so. We have permitted the
petitioner (father of the girl) as also the petitioner's wife (mother of
the girl) to confer with their daughter in camera proceedings. The
daughter of the petitioner has, in unequivocal terms, said that she
has left her parents of her own accord and that she was living
with the respondent No. 8 at her sweet will. She declined to
maintain any relations with her parents.
(3.) ON the parents suggesting that she was married to another person, the girl has maintained that the said marriage had been
against her wishes and rather, she was forced into the same. Her
suggestions before us have been, more or less, in conformity with
her statements under Section 161 Cr.P.C. recorded on
02.07.2013. We have permitted even the grand-mother of the girl to confer with her but the girl stood to her ground and declined to
go to the parental house.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.