JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) HEARD .
(2.) THIS application is being preferred on behalf of convict applicant- Laxman Singh to have temporary suspension of sentence
awarded by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST) Cases, Pali in
Sessions Case No.122/2000 vide the judgment and order dated
11.07.2011 convicting him for the offences under Sections 341, 323/34, 364/34 of IPC r/w Section 3 (2) (5) of SC/ST Act and for the offence u/s 302/34 r/w S. 3 (2) (5) of SC/ST Act, on account of
providing assistance to his two sons, namely, Govind Singh and
Narendra Singh, of the applicant for admission in 9th standard and 6th
standard respectively and, so also, to his niece, namely, Ms.
Durgesh and nephew, namely, Surya Pratap Singh, who have
passed 11th standard and 9th standard, whose father, namely,
Hanuman Singh had expired during the trial on 22.11.2008.
It is stated that sons of the applicant, namely, Govind Singh and Narendra Singh and, so also, niece and nephew, namely,
Ms. Durgesh and Surya Pratap Singh are upright students and have
qualified from a Govt. School. It is also stated by the learned counsel
for the applicant that there is no major male member in the family of
the convict-applicant except ladies, who are 'Parda-Nashin", to
extend the assistance required. Learned counsel for the petitioner
also argued that a coordinate bench of this Court has granted
temporary bail in similar situation while allowing D.B. Criminal Misc.
Temporary Bail Application (Suspension of Sentence) Application
No.689/2008- Suresh Choudhary Vs. State vide the order dated
29.05.2013.
(3.) LEARNED Public Prosecutor does not dispute the fact that during the trial the applicant was on bail.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.