JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) LIS involved in all these writ petitions is common
and all are founded on identical facts, therefore, they are
disposed of by a common order.
(2.) THE facts, in brief, giving rise to all these petitions are that the petitioners are working on contract
basis as Gram Rojgar Sahayak/Data Operators in MNREGA
under various panchayat samities of the State. As per
version of the petitioners, most of them are working on
contract basis since 2008 and their contract of employment
was extended upto 31st August 2013. Assailing the
impugned advertisement dated 14th February 2013, issued
by the Department of Rural Development and Panchayati
Raj, Government of Rajasthan, for making direct
recruitment to the post of Lower Division Clerk, petitioners
have averred in the writ petitions that criteria for selection
is full of anomalies and the same has deprived many
aspirants for the job from their right of consideration in an
absolutely arbitrary manner. Apart from quashing of the
advertisement aforementioned, the petitioners have also
prayed for relief that they may not be removed from the
services without following due process of law and affording
an opportunity of bearing heard. In S.B. Civil Writ
Petition No.6799/2013 (Balvinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of
Rajasthan & Ors.), an additional affidavit is submitted and
dated 7th
alongwith the additional affidavit, order of
February 2013 is enclosed, which indicates that the term of
contract of employment has been extended upto 31st of
August 2013. Alongwith Additional Affidavit, one more
document, a communication dated 5th of July 2013, issued
by the department is also enclosed.
On behalf of the respondents, reply to the writ petition has been submitted. In the return, the respondents
have raised the preliminary objection that joint writ petition
is not maintainable. Switching on to the prayer of the
petitioners for quashing the select list, the respondents
have specifically pleaded that the select list is yet to be
prepared and therefore the writ petition is premature and
on that count alone merits dismissal. Defending the
process of selection initiated by the department, the
respondents have submitted in the writ that the entire
selection is being carried out in strict adherence of the rules
governing the said province and in the process of selection
no illegality whatsoever has been committed by them. In
the return, the respondents have also stated that the
incumbents, who have applied pursuant to the
advertisement dated 14th February 2013 and offered their
candidature for selection, have been allowed to participate
in the selection process and no eligible candidate has been
deprived of his right of consideration. As per the reply of
the respondents, almost all the petitioners have participated
in the selection process without any demur. With these
pleadings in the reply, the respondents have sought
dismissal of the writ petition.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners Mr. RDS Kharlia and Ms. Pintoo Pareek have strenuously urged that
before issuance of the advertisement dated 14th February
2013 the requisite number of vacancies were not determined by the respondents and therefore the entire
selection process is bad in law. Attacking the selection
process, learned counsel for the petitioners have urged that
the selection process has not been carried out in a
transparent manner and the methodology of the selection
process is absolutely arbitrary which has resulted in
deprivation of many eligible candidates who are eligible to
compete for the selection. The learned counsel for the
petitioners would urge that the petitioners have participated
in the selection process but during selection process the
criteria for selection was not uniformly pressed into service
and the same has resulted in exclusion of their names from
the select list in an absolutely arbitrary and unfair manner.
The sum and substance of the contention of the learned
counsel for the petitioners is that the entire selection is a
farce and it is essentially aimed to deprive the petitioners
from their job which they are carrying out on contract basis
under various schemes of MNREGA since last so many
years.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.