MEENA ALIAS HEMA Vs. KOMAL DEVI
LAWS(RAJ)-2003-11-38
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on November 12,2003

MEENA ALIAS HEMA Appellant
VERSUS
KOMAL DEVI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) By the impugned order, the learned trial Court has held that the suit as framed is covered by Section 35(1) of the Court Fees Act, and therefore, the plaintiff should pay court-fees accordingly. Obviously, if the court-fee is not paid, the suit should be dismissed.
(3.) The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that on a bare reading of Section 35 as a whole it becomes clear that the present is a suit, which is covered by Section 35(2), and not by Section 35(1).;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.