JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This revision petition has
been filed by the petitioners-judgment debtors against the order D/- 18-5-2004 passed
by the learned Civil Judge (J. D.), Merta in
Execution Case No. 3/2004 by which the
application for execution of the decree
D/- 14-1-1970 passed by the learned Dist.
Judge, Merta was allowed and the learned
Executing Court held that in terms of decree D/- 14-1-1970 the respondents-decree
holder were entitled to perform Seva Puja
in the Bhanwal Mata Ji Temple and also to
receive offerings and for that warrant for
possession was issued so that they could
make Seva Puja and receive offerings, be
quashed and set aside.
(2.) It may be stated that Ram Pal Puri
(present decree holder-respondents are Legal Representatives of Rampal Puri) filed a
civil suit No. 369/1953 in the Court of
Munsif, Merta for declaration against Kuna
Puri and Mohan Puri (judgment debtors-petitioners are legal representatives of Kuna
Puri and Mohan Puri) seeking declaration
regarding their right to worship in Bhanwal
Mata Ji Temple.
2A. The said suit was dismissed by the
learned Civil Judge, Merta vide judgment
and decree D/- 30-11-1956. Against the
judgment and decree D/- 30-11 -1956, Ram
Pal Puri filed a Civil Appeal No. 35/57 in
the Court of Dist. Judge, Merta in which a
decree by way of compromise was passed
declaring the rights of the worship between
the parties (Rampal Puri and Mohan Puri)
in the manner that both the parties would
have right of worship and receiving offerings 6 months each in a year by turn and
thereafter turn by turn, they would perform
the Seva Puja and receive offerings and the
offerings which were being presented before
the deity would be taken by that party in
whose favour turn was running.
(3.) That compromise decree which was
passed on 29-4-1957 was again amended
on the basis of compromise through judgment and decree D/- 14-1-1970 passed by
the Dist. Judge, Merta and according to
fresh compromise decree D/- 14-1-1970,
name of Kuna Puri was also added along
with Mohan Puri (present petitioners are
Legal Representatives of Mohan Puri as well
as Kuna Puri) meaning thereby that share
of judgment-debtors, namely, Mohan Puri
and Kuna Puri in the Seva Puja of the temple
was 50% and similarly /share of decree holder
Rampal Puri (present respondents are Legal Representatives of Ram Pal Puri) was
50% and thus Mohan Puri and Kuna Puri
would have right of Seva Puja for 6 months
each in a year, whereas right of Seva Puja of
decree-holder Rampal Puri would be for one
year and thereafter the turn would rotate.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.