N C MEHTA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
LAWS(RAJ)-1972-7-6
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on July 12,1972

N C Mehta Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

P.N.SHINGHAL, J. - (1.) THE petitioner passed the M.S. (General Surgery) examination in April 1960 and entered the service of the Rajasthan State as Civil Assistant Surgeon in May 1960. He held that post on a substantive basis when he was appointed Civil Assistant Surgeon -cum -Tutor in surgery for the periods mentioned by him, and then as Lecturer in surgery from September 16, 1965 to July 30, 1967. At that time the Rajasthan Medical Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1962 were in force. He was appointed as officiating Reader in surgery in the Medical College at Bikaner, for a period of one year, by an order dated July 20, 1967. Similar appointments were given to some of the respondents. The petitioner took over charge as officiating Reader on August 1, 1967, but the Government amended that order on August 16, 1967 and made the petitioner an officiating Lecturer. He challenged that order by writ petition No. 150 of 1968 which was allowed by a learned single Judge on July 22, 1968. The petitioner therefore continued to work as a Reader.
(2.) THE State Government promulgated the Rajasthan Medical Service (Collegiate Branch) Special Selection Rules, 1968, hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1968', on February 23, 1968, and it was specifically provided in Rule 1(3) that they shall if main in force for a period of one year. It is not in dispute that the period of operation of the Rules of 1968 was extended up to January 31, 1970 by a subsequent amendment. The State Government determined the vacancies in the Clinical Wing of the Rajasthan Medical Service (Collegiate Branch) and notified them. The petitioner and respondents Nos. 3 to 15 applied for appointment as Readers in surgery They appeared before the Special Recruitment Board (hereinafter referred to as 'the Board' which was constituted under the Rules' of 1968 for interviewing and recommending the names of suitable candidates for appointment to the service The petitioner was selected for appointment as a Reader in surgery, while Dr. S.S. Rawat, respondent No. 6, and D.L. Kanwar, respondent No. 10. were selected as Lecturers. A writ petition (No. 217 of 1970; was filed by Dr. S.N. Gupta to challenge the selections. It was allowed by Mr. Justice Kan Singh vide his judgment dated July 7, 1970, in S.N. Gupta v. State of Rajasthan 1970 RLW 539, with the following direction. The result is that order Ex -3 (sic) is not valid in so far as the, appointment of Readers in surgery under Rule 10 of the 1967 (sic) Rules is concerned. Accordingly, it is declared that respondents Nos. 8 to 18 have not been validly appointed as Readers in terms Ex -13 The appointments of these respondents are to be treated only as in officiating capacity till the Government make valid appointments. The Government are further directed to reconvene the Selection Board' who shall interview all the candidates for the posts of Readers who had' applied under the 1967 (sic) Rules. The Board shall draw up a fresh list of Readers in the light of the criterion laid down in the Rules. The Government shall make appointments of Readers from the list prepared by the Board and then arrange persons appointed in the order of seniority. This shall be done within a period of six months from today. The writ petition is dismissed against respondents Nos. 3 to 7. The parties are left to bear their own costs. The learned Counsels are in agreement that Kan Singh J., did not direct the making of the fresh selections otherwise then under the Rules of 1968.
(3.) THE State Government accordingly reconvened the Board on December 2 and 3, 1970. On receipt of its recommendations, the Government issued order Ex -2 dated January 7, 1971 appointing respondents Nos. 3 to 13 as Readers in surgery and the petitioner and Dr. G.S Ghalot, respondent No. 14, as Lecturer in Surgery. The same day, a corrigendum (Ex -2) was issued by which the portion relating to the appointment of the petitioner and Dr. G.S. Ghalot as Lecturer was deleted altogether. The petitioner was relieved of the post of Reader on January 25, 1971 and was asked to await orders. He represented his case to the Government and was posted as officiating Reader in Surgery by order Ex -5 dated March 16, 1971, with effect from March 1, 1971, along with respondents Dr. G.S. Ghalot. It was stated that the appointments were temporary, for a period of six months, or until candidates selected by the Departmental Promotion Committee/Rajasthan Public Service Commission were available, whichever was earlier.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.