JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated
28.1.2008 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Rajsamand whereby the learned Magistrate has taken
cognizance against the petitioners for offences under
Sections 420 & 120B I.P.C. The petitioners are also
aggrieved by the order dated 7.3.2009 passed by the
Sessions Judge, Rajsamand, whereby the learned Judge
has upheld the order dated 28.1.2008.
(2.) The brief facts of the case are that respondent
No.2, Mr. Manak Lal, submitted a complaint before the
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajsamand on 5.12.2005, wherein
he claimed that Smt. Kamla Devi, petitioner No.1, is the
owner of the Marble Mine No.178/85 in village Nizarna.
(3.) The said mine is lookedafter by his son, Mr. Deshbandhu,
petitioner No.2. Part of this mine was given by them to one
Khemraj for operating the said mine. Subsequently, Mr.
Khemraj, entered into an agreement with the complainant,
Manak Lal. According to the agreement, out of the profit,
60% was to be of the complainant, and 40% was to be
retained by the mine owner. According to the complainant,
he started operating the mine in the year 2001. However,
subsequently because of certain disputes, Mr. Khemraj was
removed from the partnership. The complainant further
alleged that thereafter, the mine owner continued to
operate the mine and when he asked for his part of the
share, they denied the same. According to him, he has
invested about Rs. 15 lakhs. Moreover, his machines, other
articles and goods are still lying in the mines.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.