JUDGEMENT
SANDEEP MEHTA,J. -
(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
(2.) THE present anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner apprehending his arrest in
connection with FIR No. 366/2012 registered
at the Police Station. Hiranmagri, Dist. Udaipur
for the oifences under Sections 384 and 376 IPC.
The facts necessary for disposal of the bail application are enumerated herein below.
The prosecutrix Mst. 'M' aged 28 years filed
a written report with the S.H.O. Hiranmagri on
12.7.2012 with the allegations:- ...[VERNACULAR TEXT OMMITED]...
(3.) ON the basis of the said allegation, F.I.R. No. 66/2012 was registered and investigation
commenced. Prior to filing of the report, the
prosecutrix also filed and application with the
State Women Commission in May, 2012
wherein also the allegation of prolonged physical relations with the petitioner was levelled. The
complainant in her report as well as in the complaint submitted to the Women Commission has
alleged that accused allegedly gave her some
stupefying agent to drink alongwith water and
then committed rape with her and thereafter also
he continued to commit the acts of forcible intercourse with her after assuring her that they
are husband and wife. She has further alleged
that on coming to know that accused is married
from before, she confronted him but he assured
that he would still marry her. She has further
alleged that the accused used to blackmail her
by telling her that he had a blue film of her which
he would make public. She has lastly stated that
on 23.4.2012 the accused called her in the night
at 11 and told her that he is going to Udaipur
and that she should come there or else he would
make public the blue film after which she filed
the complaint with the Women Commission.
When the prosecutrix was examined under Section 164 Cr.P.C she stated that the petitioner
was a good teacher used to teach her at Bhinder.
Thereafter she went to Udaipur for pursuing,
further studies and stayed at Sector No, 6,
Hiranmagri in a rented room. The petitioner allegedly came to her room and tried to develop
intimacy with the prosecutrix. He also took a
room on rent near the room of the prosecutrix.
She has further alleged that the accused used to
come to her room for studies and she also used
to go to his room frequently. She has further
stated that in July, 2005 in the noon at 1-11/2 the
accused gave her water and tea after mixing
some intoxicant therein. The prosecutrix has
stated that she came to senses about four hours
later and saw that her clothes were in a disheveled state and she was bleeding. When she accosted the accused with these facts, he allegedly admitted that he had established sexual relations with her whilst she was unconscious. She
allegedly slapped the accused and went back to
her roomi She has further alleged that the accused called her on phone and threatened her
that he would circulate the blue film which he
possessed. She has admitted that despite all these
happenings whenever accused called her she
used to go to him and the accused used to establish sexual relations with her despite her resistance sometime after a scuffle and sometimes
by threatening to cut himself by knife. The prosecutrix further alleged that when she came to
know that the accused is already married, she
contracted him. The accused told her that he did
not like his wife and wanted to marry her and
thereafter both of them went to Neemach Marri
and there the accused put Mangala Sutra in her
neck. Thereafter the accused was selected in
AIEEE Examination held at Jaipur in the year
2006. The accused took her to Jaipur and there they contacted sexual relations at the hotel.
Thereafter also the accused used to come to
Udaipur on every Saturday and Sunday and allegedly used to commit sexual intercourse with
the prosecutrix. The prosuctrix thereafter was
selected in B.Ed, in 2007 and went to Sirohi
and the accused used to come to Sirohi also and
took her to various hotels etc. where he used to
have sexual intercourse with her. She went to
Pushkar, Ajmer, Jaipur and Nathdwara with the
accused where the accused established sexual
relations with her. She has further stated that
she told her brother about these facts in the year
2008 and her brother talked with the accused and his family members who apologized on behalf of the accused and the accused allegedly
promised that he would destroy the blue film
but thereafter again the accused started calling
her on phone in the year 2009 and told her that
he cannot live without her and she should come
to him and ultimately she made a complaint to
the Women Commission after coming to know
that the accused had eloped with another girl.
She has further stated that since the accused and
his family members had apologized with her,
therefore, the matter came to rest and she did
not take any action against the accused but since
accused persisted with his threats, she has filed
the report.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.