NARAYAN SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
LAWS(RAJ)-2012-9-295
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on September 21,2012

NARAYAN SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
The State of Rajasthan and Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, J. - (1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.
(2.) In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to grant bonus marks for the questions which are asked out of syllabus and merit list may kindly be revised and if petitioner stands in merit after awarding bonus marks then he may be called for interview for the post of Sub -Inspector, Rajasthan Police. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I have perused the entire record of the case.
(3.) IN my opinion, the establishment of RPSC is for the purpose of selecting suitable candidates for government service under provisions of the Constitution of India. Whether the questions put to the candidates are according to the syllabus or not, it is not for this Court to decide while exercising powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The question papers are prepared by the expert body of RPSC and if petitioner is having any grievance, then he can file representation before the RPSC. This Court cannot sit as an appellate authority to decide the controversy with regard to grievances of the persons that questions are out of syllabus.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.