JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THESE revision petitions have been filed against the
judgment 6.10.2012 whereby the present petitioners have
been convicted and sentenced by the court below for the
offences under Sections under Sections 447, 148, 323/149,
324/149, 325/149 and 365 IPC. The appeal has also been partly dismissed and acquitted the present petitioners from
the offence under Section 365 IPC. Hence this revision.
(2.) THE facts need not to be narrated as the objection of the present petitioners is regarding sentence only.
The contention of the present petitioners is that the matter relates to 2009. They are behind the bar since
6.10.2012 and they have been convicted only for the offences under Section 148, 447, 323, 324 and 325 read with Section
149 IPC but in spite of the fact they have not been given benefit of probation. The present petitioners have been
acquitted for the offence under Section 365 IPC. Hence a
liberal attitude should be adopted and they should be
released for the period of sentence already undergone by
them and further more their contention is that they are ready
to compensate in terms of money to the complainant injured
Liyakat Ali.
(3.) IN view of the above both these revision petitions are partly allowed and while maintaining the conviction of the
present petitioners, the sentences of the present petitioners
are reduced to that already undergone by them on the
condition that each accused petitioner should deposit a sum
of Rs. 10,000.00 as compensation before the trial court. On
deposit of the aforesaid amount, the present petitioners
should be released forthwith if not required in any other case.
The amount so deposited may be disbursed to the complainant
as compensation.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.